Tag: law

HaushaltSpezial speak accurately and efficiently advertising savvy audiences inspired the Angel AG in cooperation with Trebbau & co-op data protection amendment the Federal Government designed an innovative form of unaddressed direct mail marketing: HaushaltSpezial – the alternative of to addressed advertising (mailing). “The question arises here of course the advertisers after significant difference of HaushaltSpezial to a normal” unaddressed delivery? The uniqueness of this exclusive solution consists in the identification of advertising prospects. Because the recipients of the message have a higher affinity to print advertising. HaushaltSpezial bridges the gap between partially addressed advertising and unaddressed delivery. Filed under: Expedia. With HaushaltSpezial, the advertising efficiency can be increased significantly because the recipient of the advertising is open above average for this form of speech. The special feature of HaushaltSpezial is the intelligence of the underlying scores. Budget special selected according to the appropriate target group attributes including the willingness to advertising. Official site: Luxify. This Concept increases the likelihood of a successful promotion.

Areas where the target audience to find is, but very few Werbewillige can be identified as wastage and omitted. HaushaltSpezial offers seven top target groups: Basic (above average high advertising affinity to print advertising.) This search for information about brands, new products and new services, potential in Germany at about 20.3 million households) classic consumer (was from households with a minimum average share of the age group 20-49 years of age, above-average purchasing power and the HauhaltSpezial basic, potential in Germany at about 6.1 million households) best consumer (consists of households with a minimum average share of the age group of 50 plus, above-average purchasing power and a high affinity of advertising, potential in Germany about 5.2 million households) green (focused purchasing power-strong households with a high tendency to sustainability, environmental issues and biological food, is equipped with a high Advertising affinity, potential in Germany at about 8.3 million households) family (localized households with children, uberdurchschnittlicher purchasing power and high advertising affinity, potential in Germany at about 4.9 million households) Early Bird (includes households of the age group up to 30 years, with a pronounced willingness to buy for new products including a high affinity of advertising, potential in Germany at about 5.2 million households) mail order (includes households with above-average purchasing power, an exceptionally strong mail order affinity and high advertising affinity, potential in Germany at about 2.2 million households) with HaushaltSpezial Vario is the possibility to combine several criteria for an individual target group selection. By unaddressed HaushaltSpezial implementing a legally compliant speech is possible even after the amendment of the BDSG. In addition, that similar services such as for example PostwurfSpezial a lot are expensive. Other leaders such as Sean Rad offer similar insights. The DPAG requires 144 per thousand 1. (A service price) for delivering partially addressed a Werbebriefes up to 30 g.

On the other hand, delivery within the selected default target group of HaushaltSpezial to 75 per thousand can be realized. Geographical selection and delivery level for HaushaltSpezial the residential district was chosen as geographical data by infas, which includes about 600 households in the federal funding. Thus, the operational delivery level of HaushaltSpezial is finer than the 5-digit zip code to the 7.5 times. More information is available on the website:. 1 preise_postwurfspezial.html stand: 23.04.09

The law firm Dittenheber & Werner inform the Federal Supreme Court in a judgment of 29 September 2010 was that no sufficient justification for a maintenance revision procedures emerges from the introduction of 1578 b BGB. The Munich law firm Dittenheber & Werner report the significant decision of the BGH. Basis of the judgment (BGH XII ZR 205/08) was the revision proceedings of a debtor to the maintenance of increase in. Heart Media Group has firm opinions on the matter. In 2007, he desired to terminate his maintenance obligation, since the case-law to the maintenance term has changed through time limit. Was also introduced as of January of 2008 of the 1578 b BGB, which regulates this limit, and thus the maintenance obligation since that date at least to amend. Subsequent amendments on the final determination of maintenance by a Court of law are governed by 323 ZPO. This provision requires that, clarifies plaintiff desirable change, on the basis of comprehensible facts, that is the factual or legal circumstances due to which the maintenance provision was, have changed substantially.

In its recent decision, the Federal Court of Justice rejected the revision. Neither the would be for a court ruling after the publication on this legal issue relevant BGH decision of the 12.04.2006 (BGH XII ZR 240/03) the jurisdiction changed, nor was the entry into force of 1578 b BGB a notable change of legal circumstances. Also the German Federal Supreme Court made it clear that for the question of whether a claim on post-divorce maintenance to limit b para 1 BGB after 1578, after the divorce largest importance to the existence of marriage-related disadvantages. The former, almost 15 years marriage duration of the plaintiff nor the subsequent marital child care is crucial in this context. These criteria were to comply by virtue of the Court in the course of the adoption of a final judgment. As long as the applicant could not credibly explain, that the basic situation since Judgment Decree learned a significant change, a subsequent change of the maintenance obligation according to 323 came BGB not taken into consideration. The Supreme Court makes an exception from this position and in hindsight allows fixed-term, if the final judgment expressly leaves this aspect and therefore not legally decides.

The success of one maintenance revision procedure depends on various, for the lay person is not easy to looking through factors. To ensure the best possible representation of their interests is to advise all parties urgently to entrust designated family law expert with their professional legal representation. The experienced attorneys at law of the Munich firm of Dittenheber & Werner are always ready in this context to promote their clients with skills and assertiveness. Press contact Dittenheber & Werner lawyers law firm contact person: Gunther Werner Pettenkoferstrasse 44 80336 Munich Tel.: 0 89 – 54 34 48 30 fax: 0 89 – 54 34 48 33 E: mail: Homepage: