SPo Government Vienna

Proposed amendment of the Vienna land Security Act by the SPo Government Vienna, March 26, 2010 – due to an Initiativantrages of the Wiener Landtag is to decide today the amendment of the Vienna land Security Act, stating that in the future the begging in Vienna will be prohibited. The self-help Association in favour of SOCIUS against poverty and social exclusion decided against the proposed amendment of article 2 of the Vienna State security law and against a general ban on begging Vienna. According to the previous provisions, begging in Vienna is already under penalty, if it is in a public place, in intrusive or aggressive manner, or if it’s organized begging or begging with children. Planned city government is recently by the Viennese SPo, also professional begging should be banned and placed under punishment. The concept of earning based StGB, due to lack of its own definition in the Vienna State security law, the provision of article 70 and would mean that so generally each Begging in Vienna is forbidden. Learn more on the subject from Dunkin’ Donuts. Begging is a typical manifestation of poverty in public.

To combat these up to 700 EUR prohibitions and penalties are people illegal intrusion into the privacy of social fringe groups and represent not a suitable means for an effective fight against of the causes of poverty. Also the establishment of the Initiativantrages, which are based exclusively on General subjective findings, tabled by Martina Ludwig, Nurten Yilmaz, Silvia Rubik, Barbara Novak and Nicole Krotsch,…Lately, people increasingly occur,… Learn more about this with Marko Dimitrijevic. or… comes again to harassment… are based there, show the social responsibility of the applicant to the disadvantaged people in society. For some people, begging on the street represents the only remaining way out to save themselves from the full personal doom. For local politicians, with income beyond the poverty risk hard to imagine, however, everyday, for the people concerned mostly bitter reality. A general ban on begging are people illegal intrusion into privacy of social fringe groups and represent a serious socio-political issue. This should be treated as such and not misused for partisan or populist purposes with regard to the upcoming municipal election.

Austrian Federal Chancellor

And if then still falls the choice on an independent personality, so at least close to a particular ideological direction is mostly in the biography or the public perception depict. Directly elected can occur even a truly independent personality at least by the system and also win, that completely escaped from the socialization of the Chamber and party State in their lives before. However, this poses a threat to the established political system. Austrian presidential election the Austrian presidential election of the 2nd Republic were designed in 1945 as people up on the first. This meant that there was a situation for long periods of time about that Chancellor and President were not of the same political direction or were supported by this. So it was in the Years from 1945 to 1970 and 2004-2006 Austrian Federal Chancellor and SPo President, in the years of 1986 to 2000 SPo Federal Chancellor and oVP President. And the years 2000-2004 were a formal political identity between Austrian Chancellor and SPo President while with Wolfgang Schussel and Thomas Klestil represent, in terms of content, there was the biggest differences, contradictions and tensions here.

Of course, the popular election in Austria as a result has produced also exclusively representatives of political elites as heads of State, alone the people could at least decisive influence. So, it took approximately 1950, 1986 and 1992 respectively, two rounds of voting until the election of the head of State was certain. A vibrant democracy was made possible. The directly elected Federal President in Austria on the basis of the constitutional amendment 1929 is not primarily was designed corrective and counterpoint to the Chambers and the party State from the starting point as a democratic institution, but against the background of a Development democracy much more as a corrective and counterpoint to the party of the first Republic and its excesses. Alone, the first Republic did not see this direct dial and Austria went down in 1938 as a Democratic Republic of 1933/1934 and as an independent State, without having the function of the President had done a decisive resistance here in favor of democracy. The democratic politics so important task of corrective and Gegenpols to the Chamber and party State surrendered only after 1945 for the role of head of State. That this was really used by any previous President is deplorable in practice, but in the approach the role but constitutionally well landscaped.

The personality influences the Office remains a fact crucial shapes the personality the Office. If a personality wants to actually represent the people and their interests, then the direct election are a sufficient legitimacy you. A President can be modeled, can place subjects, may require results to developments comment on. He constitutionally also has the ability to make corrections and alone by his Office to persuade the other powers, to decide in a democratic and constitutional. Ultimately it depends always of personality. A popular vote can only help to provide the necessary support to this personality for such attitudes and actions.

Federal Government

Federal Government denied necessary responsibility for ensuring an adequate protection of violence affected women Federal Government denied necessary responsibility for ensuring an adequate protection of violence affected women. Women’s advice centre, emergency calls and houses request a guaranteed land financing of the help system instead of the current, always uncertain and administrative complex mixed financing for years. Despite significant gaps and a reduction due to the shrinking aid offer for violence-affected women, negates the Government a structural deficiency and insists on keeping the ailing financing of a system of assistance which a substantial increase in demand is imminent. Often up to 25% of its human resources must use Hamburg, 17.08.12. women’s advice centre to ensure the wide level of the institution. These resources are missing in the violence-affected women advice.

The guiding principle for the protection of victims of violence guided in the study of the BMFSFJ calls for timely consulting access etc. Concerned, as well as independent consulting with affected children, advice and accompaniment to the victims rights and access to services to the psychological processing of the experiences. The current supply not do justice to this mission statement: the waiting time for a consultation appointment amounts to some two to three weeks. In rural areas, also the “next” counselling is often too far away to be reached. Necessary intervention offers are not possible due to the lack of human resources, although professional knowledge and skills are available. The wait time for therapy courses is more than six months, the specific knowledge is missing many therapists to successfully treat victims of domestic violence.

Deletion of posts and resources search deter women’s counselling centres and homes, maintain sufficient publicity. Women, the only mental-verbal or other non-physical violence experienced in their partnership are due to the structure and dynamics of Abuse relationships often unaware that her experience subject to domestic violence, they are entitled to help and how/where they get it. “Many women are totally surprised when they hear that women’s counselling centres and women’s shelters are open to women, suffer the”only”psychological violence”, Kerstin describes Zander, founder of re-empowerment.de and spokeswoman of the Association, the situation. Also, some virtually abstruse ideas existed about life in a women’s refuge. The beginning of 2013-launching nationwide hotline shall inform about available assistance and establish a pilot function for women affected in the help system. Concrete proposals be made to deal with the then rising demand. re-empowerment is an information and Exchange platform for women affected by violence of partnership with around 2000 Active members. The homonymous non-profit association was founded in 2009. Kerstin Zander –

The Parent Trap

Alone the parents choose childcare allowance nor Kita what parents really need to deliver on the their children before the compulsory education in Germany – it says in the basic law. Like the majority of parents in Germany by this decision right, exhausted from exercise, believed the debates in politics and the public, in two ways: childcare allowance or Kita for all are the slogans with which the wishes of the parents and their children are supposedly sufficiently described. Parents want to therefore either in full-time work and in good hands give their children during the day, or “Stay at home” to be as far as possible for their children. In between there is nothing apparently. And she, the parents trap lies precisely in this alleged nothing.

Children are problem or rest when publicly talked about parents, children and care in Germany and written, is worth it, just pay attention to the nuances, are revealing this on all sides: there must “Management problem” and it must be released – just in vogue – the women in the case of part-time. Even the youngest children must not only maintained, but – by all means, it seems – “promoted” and finally the State untutored “rest of children” must be managed somehow. You know what? Children are in German debates – we noticed before it at this point – especially one: A problem and apparently especially for their parents. Schizophrenic and functionally it’s a schizophrenic finding, in his Gruseligkeit hard to beat that. What went wrong, when parents begin to think about the greatest happiness in their lives – their children – in staff fear and issue categories? When are parents looking after the simultaneity of successful professional career and perfect parenting is seemingly tear? Now, if something went wrong, depends on the location of interest. The parent trap is economically considered an absolute model of success.

What could be late-capitalistic ideology formation fit better in that, as workers who answer emails before loud bad conscience on the changing table? What parents really need to deliver childcare allowance nor Kita would the parents ask themselves according to their needs and would this obligation free answer, you would get the reply, it stated that above all this probably “either / or” is that it keeps the parents in the case. A flexible concept of working life, actually long overdue in the ‘developed’ world, would depict the basic knowledge, however, that the life, especially the parents, consists of stages with changing priorities. That a to deriving from this permeability between family, work and other life priorities must be no utopia, would show an honest look beyond Central Europe to the North. In the meantime but parents March foreign bidding, straight into the parent trap. Andreas Kellner…