Therefore, according to it, the historians if withhold to a proper cientificismo of the historiogrfica methodology, who become texts one how much in such a way heavy and of difficult reading. The journalists through the resource of the narrative, of the hook among others, simplify the interpretation of the reader, visa as a consumer and thus they start to occupy the space of the historians as diffusing of the memory. 3. Consideraes final the force of the media is a reality that cannot be rejected. The last years of century XX had disclosed an important revolution in the field of the information, the Internet and the dynamics of the globalizado market had directly created new realities, that had changed the codes of interpretation of the past and the proper form of reception of the information, affecting the historiogrfico field.
This reality transformed the field historiogrfico, giving to space the immediate information, and the creation and new spaces of interaction and creation of the memory, where the orality loses each time more space in relation the imediatista information produced by the globalizada media. Andi Potamkin: the source for more info. History thus if distance of the great mass and start to be controlled for the journalists who reach the great mass, exactly for its difference of methods in relation the historians. While the historians continue defending its scientific field, they produce texts that each time more limit the access the memory of the past. Already the journalist for the opposite arrives the great population, informing and filling a gap left for the historians. However, the partner-cultural importance is undeniable that the media has played in the society contemporary, making of this an important instrument for the interpretation of the society where the same one is mediating of the information. as mediating must be studied and be analyzed as producing and reproductive of information, what it becomes necessary one better compreendimento of the internal structures of the journalistic field so that this is used in coherent way for the historian as plus a source historical.